th comments
mn said: "I was very happy to see a GREEN reasonably affordable product in my supermarket and bought the Chlorox Greenworks cleaner. Ah, sorry folks..." [read]

John Taylor said: "Talk about insane spin doctoring! If the school promotes cycling, and a kid is killed on the road, then the school can be held liable. ..." [read]

Jason Hall said: "Thank you for beinging this situation to our awareness. It is really inspiring to remember that adults are not always right. Go students !..." [read]

Sara Snow said: "Wow - great 'buzz' going on here. I so happy to hear that many of you have also had success with local bee pollen or honey for allergies. Bu..." [read]

s-designer777 said: "is good idea but i am think is use difficult when move product / i am young design of thailand i am just new friend is designer connect m..." [read]

Liquid Chimney Could Reduce Global Warming

by Christine Lepisto, Berlin on 11.12.06
Science & Technology

chimney.03.jpg Turn global warming gases into coral beds? Could this be real? Tom Kiser, who made his reputation working together with William McDonough on the greening of the Ford River Rouge plant, claims to have a smokestack which will capture the gases which cause greenhouse effects and turn them into harmless material, which could even be deposited in the ocean to restore coral reefs.

The full report at CNN Money is worth reading, as much for the interesting profile of a man driven to solve the technological problems of waste as for information about the system Kiser dubs a "liquid chimney". But the issue which concerns us is: could this work? The picture shows Kiser standing on a pile of stainless steel rings which the article claims help to filter out greenhouse gas. In fact, what Kiser has in mind sounds a lot like what is commonly referred to in industry as a "scrubber" or a "gas washer". The principle involves routing the waste gas flow into a chamber packed with some objects such as the steel rings Kiser is standing on. The steel rings provide a large surface area for a liquid, sprayed in at the top of the chamber, to flow over. At the surface of the liquid, particles or gases are trapped and either dissolved in the liquid or reacted to a harmless (or less harmful) substance, depending on which technology is being used. The technology is probably in use in many businesses in your own home town, keeping odors or dust or harmful chemicals out of the air you breath.

The trick is that gases such as carbon dioxide do not stay dissolved well (think about what happens when you open a bottle of soda). And they are usually produced in such large quantities, that the idea of reacting them quickly proves uneconomical. Common chemicals such as sodium hydroxide (caustic soda) or potassium hydroxide (potash) can react with carbon dioxide. In the case of sodium hydroxide, the product formed is sodium carbonate, a harmless chemical--so harmless, it is in fact the chemical which makes ramen noodles "instant". But imagine the cost of buying the sodium hydroxide, and then disposing of the carbonate afterwards.

So it appears Kiser's secret is finding a way to make this process cost effective. Our conclusion: it can work. Is Kiser the man who can make it work at a price which will not drive energy prices too high for a person heating their house on a pension? We'll be watching Kiser; his company, Professional Supply, Inc. (PSI); and his customer, POM Wonderful. Good luck guys.

Via ::CNN Money

Comments (7)

Are you trying to say ramen noodles are harmless?

jump to top Anonymous says:

Competition is rising in this industry. Take a look at this in development technology.

http://www.co2solution.com/a-index.html

jump to top Jean-Thomas says:

Sounds like a good idea in principle. Disposal doesn't have to result in a solid - why not just pipe the carbon rich water underground for storage? Based on my limited understanding, cold water (at 4°C) will hold a lot of dissolved carbon dioxide in the form of carbonic acid - trouble is the exhaust gasses are likely to be too hot.

But then you could solve this with a co-generation heat exchanger that powers the pumps.

jump to top veloboy says:

I don't know much about converting gases but I do feel strongly about one thing. How are the people of the world going to make changes without a current solution. Not in the next ten to twelve years but now. the problem is now so why not the solution. Us believers can convence others by taking action and showing them the differences we make by using the device.

jump to top Anonymous says:

Focusing on new technologies like this is important, but I think it often distracts from what we can do right now with existing technology.

Making basic changes in our daily lives will have a huge impact on preventing global warming from getting worse, if we act together.

coooooooooolllllll

jump to top somebody says:

wow! this has really made my day... it is so exciting!!!!!!! I LOVE EVERYONE!

jump to top SOPHITA WARRIOR PRINCESS says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads