most popular:
2008 Holiday Gift Guides



most popular: Hot Home Wind Turbines


most popular:
$19k Electric Car in US


th comments
Nudger said: "Vanno - based on hundreds of user-submitted stories and thousands of votes - agrees that Apple should rank low in environmental performance (despi..." [read]

JC said: "Richard, IMHO "great is the enemy of good." Better is better despite not being perfect. For good or bad, much of our roads a..." [read]

Alan said: "Ha ha. I felt like that a few times back in the 60's!..." [read]

JC said: ""I'm starting a pothole insurance company. Bending a rim is going to become WHOLE lot more expensive." I've NEVER bent a rim, and hate to t..." [read]

JC said: "WillyBio, when I post it says "post an intelligent and CIVIL comment" How about working on the second part of that? The name callin..." [read]

AMD's Sustainable Ad Campaign

by Celine Ruben-Salama, New York, NY on 10.31.06
Science & Technology (electronics)

amd_is_green.jpg

Buss stops and phone booths in Manhattan are draped with the words, "Is Green, Saves Green. Part of a new ad campaign for the super efficient Opteron processor chips made by Intel-rival AMD, the company aims to position itself as the eco-friendly brand. A flurry of sustainable messaging from AMD, aimed mainly towards business types on Wall Street, Midtown and in the Flat Iron District started in spring of 2006 and is still going strong.

During the summer an ad with the slogan, "Scorching high speed. Without the scorching." appeared on Park Avenue. A major heat wave and much talk about the effects of global warming coincided with the campaign, helping to drive the message home.

amd_park_ave.jpg

Supporting ads around town aimed of quantify energy savings that would result from using their chip with activities that New Yorkers can relate to such as, grabbing a cup of latte on the go. These ads read: "You could've steamed every half-caf, no foam, non-fat double latte in the country with the amount of energy wasted by non-AMD powered servers.

If you are like me, electricity flows and kilowatt hours are relatively abstract concepts. However, a rough estimate of the amount of fancy coffees produced in a year in the United States is something I can quantify and wrap my head around. And it seems like a lot of energy to waste…

For the past few years, AMD chips have been efficient compared to Intel's mainstream offerings (Athlon 64/Opterons vs. Prescott Pentium IV/Xeons), producing less energy and residual heat while in operation. Things are starting to change now that Intel has released its new generation of CPUs based on the Conroe/Woodcrest architecture (Core 2 Duo), but it is probably because AMD forced Intel to fight back; it was losing some market share, especially in the server world, because its chips were running too hot. To keep the Internet and other networks we use daily up and running, server farms need to be kept cool. Many datacenters spend as much on electricity as on computer hardware. Using servers with the coolest possible chips help keep air-conditioning use and electric bills for data centers in check, and saves energy (and thus emit less CO2). Win-win.

Why waste when you can save? If nothing else, remember this pearl of wisdom from AMD's marketing team: should you find yourself faced with an opportunity to both save money and the planet don't let it pass you by.

Comments (6)

They would be greener if they stopped building over Central Texas' water source, and instead expanded their facilities in East Austin (where there is plenty of room to grow). But their low energy chips are still a good deal.

jump to top Tim says:

How do you build over a water source? Are they filling in lakes?

jump to top Anonymous says:

AMD's is a false economy. Some of their processors may have lower power (not all do), but they also have lower performance, which means that you need more systems to provide the same overall performance.

AMD had the advantage, but they blew it. Intel leads in performance per watt and is the greener choice.

jump to top Matt says:

Intel leads for now, probably not for long. If AMD want's a green image they should offer free computer recycleing.

jump to top Anonymous says:

Anonymous - they're building over an environmentally sensitive aquifer.

jump to top FlatGreg says:

AMD is not building over an aquifer, that is flat wrong. They are building an office building on a hill. Rainwater from that hill can flow to an aquifer, but the aquifer is not under their building location.

jump to top Anonymous also says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads