most popular:
2008 Holiday Gift Guides



most popular: Hot Home Wind Turbines


most popular:
$19k Electric Car in US


th comments
Robert McGibbon said: "It's more accurate to say that it runs on lemmons AND zinc. The zinc anode gets depleted. A non renewable resource so to speak...." [read]

Rod Richardson said: "Yes but... the problem with many of the major proposal on the table or in the platform is that they are either expensive (at a time the budget is s..." [read]

Rod Richardson said: "Yes but... the problem with many of the major proposal on the table or in the platform is that they are either expensive (at a time the budget is s..." [read]

barry said: "Flying seattle to galapagos dumps 12,000 pounds of greenhouse gases into our future...per person. There is no way anyone can do that level of clima..." [read]

Ms. Ueda said: "There should have been more people "melted" just like this guy! that might have been a more impactful demo. The fear of everyone starting to melt w..." [read]

Is Camouflage the New Green?

by Warren McLaren, Sydney on 09.29.06
Business & Politics (almosts)

camouflagebrit.jpg

The UK’s Times newspaper ran a weekend story on the British Department of Defence (DoD) and their contractors trying to do their bit in going green, beyond painting tanks a particular hue. They covered much of the same ground that we’ve touched on before. For instance, amongst many, we’ve noted military eco-oddities such as hybrid vehicles and folding bicycles; diesel motorbikes; solar arrays and wind turbines and that clincher lead-free bullets (aka eco-ammo). But the Times article brings us news also of quieter warheads to reduce noise pollution and reduced-smoke grenades, compostable explosives, biodegradable plastic missiles, reduced emission marine-friendly rockets and low VOC weaponry! Understandably the group, Campaign Against Arms Trade, is a tad skeptical “... they make weapons to kill people and it’s utterly ridiculous to suggest they are environmentally friendly.” But a spokeswoman for BAE, one of DOD’s suppliers suggests, “Weapons are going to be used and when they are, we try to make them as safe for the user as possible, to limit the collateral damage and to impact as little as possible on the environment.” ::The Times.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads