Greenpeace Calls For A Greener Apple
by Justin Thomas, Virginia
on 09.27.06

Some people get upset when Apple is criticized for their environmental practices. Perhaps it's because Apple is well-liked and their products are well-designed. But this is more reason for Apple be a leader in terms of recycling and incorporating non-toxic components into their machines. They've introduced some good environmental programs but they are not cutting-edge by any means. And that's the problem — Apple should be a leader in these important areas. Then they would be immune to parody sites like this one from Greenpeace. Surely it is not beyond the company to introduce a first-class recycling program, and be responsible for the lifecycle of their products. Can somebody at Apple pick up a copy of Cradle to Cradle?
Some have taken umbrage with the methodology of Greenpeace's rating system. But it is complicated subject, and hardly anyone else has taken a stab at it (only the Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition comes to mind).
See Apple Lags Behind in Recycling and Toxicity for more specifics.
Photo via EcoGeek
Thirsty for more? Check out these related articles:
- Erin Brockovich Speaks Out About Toxic Chemical Policy Reform (Interview)
- 16 Big Green Ideas We're Thankful For
- Will South Carolina Become the Nation's Premier Nuclear Waste Depository?
- What to Do with Old Eyeglasses, Printer Cartridges and Mobile Phones? Charitable Recycling
- Hot Online Retailers for Amazing, Lower Footprint Shopping
- Ed Begley, Jr., Talks Indoor Air Quality, Bag Recycling, and More

































Comments ()




