most popular:
2008 Holiday Gift Guides



most popular: Hot Home Wind Turbines


most popular:
$19k Electric Car in US


th comments
Yoav Binyamini said: ""The target price of 20 to 25 thousand euros (US $27 - 34 thousand) puts the Will in the class of affordable electric vehicles" Why not 'Ta..." [read]

Robert McGibbon said: "It's more accurate to say that it runs on lemmons AND zinc. The zinc anode gets depleted. A non renewable resource so to speak...." [read]

Rod Richardson said: "Yes but... the problem with many of the major proposal on the table or in the platform is that they are either expensive (at a time the budget is s..." [read]

Rod Richardson said: "Yes but... the problem with many of the major proposal on the table or in the platform is that they are either expensive (at a time the budget is s..." [read]

barry said: "Flying seattle to galapagos dumps 12,000 pounds of greenhouse gases into our future...per person. There is no way anyone can do that level of clima..." [read]

The Seawater Greenhouse: A Desalination / Agriculture Hybrid

by John Laumer, Philadelphia on 08.31.06
Science & Technology (solar)

Abu%20Dhabi%20Sunset.jpg

The Seawater Greenhouse offers a low cost, sustainable solution to the problem of providing water for agriculture in arid, coastal regions. “The process uses seawater to cool and humidify the air that ventilates the greenhouse and sunlight to distill fresh water from seawater. This enables the year round cultivation of high value crops that would otherwise be difficult or impossible to grow in hot, arid regions…The overall process is extremely energy efficient. 1kW of electricity expended on pumping will remove 500kW of heat. Water can be produced at low energy costs (<3kWh/m3)”. Much better than building a nuclear power plant to run a traditional desal unit. See earlier TreeHugger post on an analogous, but far less promising looking project here .

Via: The Guardian .

Comments (1)

Nukes are being built to run desalination plants? If you want a scary alternative to frame this, why not just pick whatever fossil fuel burning power plant they actually use? I'd choose a nuke plant any day of the week rather than suck in the fumes of one of those.

Regardless of all that, this greenhouse is an elegant solution. I recall reading about this awile ago, and it's nice to get an update.

jump to top libs0n says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads