th comments
Louise White said: "I have a 2002 Prius with 143,000 miles on it. Recently I started checking on my trade in value for a new Prius. Every sales person told me that I..." [read]

Lori said: "Regardless of whether or not this "soup" exists, the fact is that we need to all be aware and responsible for how we treat this planet. We have to..." [read]

Max P said: "Lunar soil (regolith) contains Helium-3, a non-radioactive isotope of Helium which is very rare on Earth. The significance of He-3 is that it can b..." [read]

Truespeak said: "Wind power works. Anyone who says it isn't perfect is correct, but no power generation is perfect, and we still use them all. I'm in the US,..." [read]

Anthony Vicari said: "@weee recycling I fail to see why nuclear should be singled out over coal for failure to plan long term. I mean, chemists predicted the ef..." [read]

Drought Marches On In The US: On The Role Of Climate Change

by John Laumer, Philadelphia on 08. 1.06
Business & Politics (news)

us%20drought%20monitor.jpg

This summer's severe heat is widely coupled with an unpleasantly dry landscape, added fire risk, and falling crop yields, with many farmers being forced to auction off their livestock. It is possible that, by this time next year, entire communities may be forced to leave drought stricken areas, as happened during the Dust Bowl era, before the idea that human cultural practices could influence climate had ever occurred to scientists. When we wrote about national drought trends this past Spring we were concerned about fire loss in a few states and the fascinating possibility that Climate Change could favor installation of distributed, renewable electricity generation technologies. In hindsight, that seems trivializing.

Five months later (see drought map for July 2006 pictured above), the severely impacted areas have broadened, shifted a bit, and encompass, also, major parts of the Northern Plains, Great Lakes, and Southeastern States. These are large scale stresses, under which, organic and factory farms alike will seriously suffer.

We speculate on three lessons from this evidence of expanding US drought.

First: just one can not properly conclude that any single weather extreme is a function of man-induced climate change, it is not possible to prove that this current drought differs significantly in causation from the one experienced 75 years ago.

Second: just as it is hypothesized that hurricane intensity is increased by global warming, it will be hypothesized, should this drought become worse, that drought intensity may be a function of global warming. That is a darn poor way to validate a climate modeling run (leading us to the final lesson).

Third: it is better to investigate and model the impacts of climate change as a basis for adaptive intervention than to wait for the economic and human pain of real drought to drive a response. Why this is not at least as interesting as hurricane risk and heat mortality is a mystery.

Comments (3)

Do you remember those red/blue maps of the US that were so popular after the 2004 Presidential Election? http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/
It would certainly look like from this drought map that God, the great spirit, what have you was favoring the states that voted Blue.
=== author's response follows ====
Interesting comment. Because this is not a political blog, we'll have to cover that one over a beer.

jump to top Jeffrey Rueppel says:

I guess "god" is punishing Mexico too. What a stupid comment.

jump to top Anonymous says:

The map comparison was just an observation and light hearted humor. But really, there might be room in an environmental blog to consider the effects of climate change on politics.

jump to top Jeffrey Rueppel says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads