most popular:
VW's 282 MPG Car



most popular:
Vertical Gardening


th comments
Uncle Mike said: "Two points... 1 Not if you have cats who like to try to unroll it. 2. Someone has way too much time on their hands. Go plant something..." [read]

Danin Kahn said: "Thats a shame, as the products were great. We tried to get some to sell online at www.todae.com.au but at that stage they were not able to supply u..." [read]

Kyra Ritter said: "Why is Cindy Crawford considered green? For one thing, she loves wearing fur, and has been pretty arrogant in interviews about her choices. <..." [read]

weee recycling said: "Note to self: never complain about recycling in the UK ever again!..." [read]

mike said: "Anne I believe you are mistaken, '6-day bicycle racers' refers to cyclist who took part in track racing events which that take place over 6 days, n..." [read]

Severn Barrage Divides UK Environmentalists

by Treehugger Interns on 07.16.06
Science & Technology (alternative energy)

severn%20barrage%201.jpg

Treehugger has already reported here this week on the UK government's Energy Review. Predictably, it is a mixed bag from a traditional environmentalist's standpoint - the emphasis on efficiency and renewables will certainly be welcomed, whilst the re-opening of the nuclear debate will be decidedly worrying for many of us.

However, there is one detail which looks set to divide much of the treehugging community in two, namely plans to build a giant barrage across the Severn Estuary. For the benefit of non-UK readers, the Severn Estuary is the stretch of water dividing Wales from South-West England, and it boasts the second highest tidal-range in the world. On the one hand, this means it has the potential to power somewhere between 5 and 10% of the UK's energy needs, on the other it is a unique habitat for wildlife which would be irreversibly changed by such a massive project. As someone who grew up on the edge of these waters, I know only too well how important these huge tides are to the distinctiveness of the local area. The difference between high tide, with water lapping at the top of the sea wall, and low, when the sea retreats behind seemingly endless mud banks, is often breathtaking to visitors. So where is a good Treehugger to stand? Whilst I would hate to join the not-in-my-back-yard crowd, I can't help but fear the potential loss of such a unique feature of our bioregion. And then there's the question of embodied energy for such a massive engineering project... [Written by: Sami Grover]

Comments (2)

Friends of the Earth advocate a system of tidal lagoons - suggesting that more energy could be produced and less habitat destroyed. I don't know the truth of the situation (and would be interested to hear different viewpoints), but the document seems fairly convincing. The address is
http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/briefings/severn_barrage_lagoons.pdf

jump to top Danothebaldyheid says:

DEJA VU
We have been through all this before. This was proposed after the 1973 oil crisis and was rejected on environmental grounds, even then.
(Incidentally, so was a coastal airport for London at Maplin Sands, near the Thames Estuary. I recently saw an article proposing that it would be better to build one coastal airport than have three near urban areas

jump to top Mike Nightingale says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads