th comments
mn said: "I was very happy to see a GREEN reasonably affordable product in my supermarket and bought the Chlorox Greenworks cleaner. Ah, sorry folks..." [read]

John Taylor said: "Talk about insane spin doctoring! If the school promotes cycling, and a kid is killed on the road, then the school can be held liable. ..." [read]

Jason Hall said: "Thank you for beinging this situation to our awareness. It is really inspiring to remember that adults are not always right. Go students !..." [read]

Sara Snow said: "Wow - great 'buzz' going on here. I so happy to hear that many of you have also had success with local bee pollen or honey for allergies. Bu..." [read]

s-designer777 said: "is good idea but i am think is use difficult when move product / i am young design of thailand i am just new friend is designer connect m..." [read]

Congress May Insure Against Coal-Induced Flatulence

by John Laumer, Philadelphia on 07. 1.06
Business & Politics (news)

imageCX30106182142.jpg

According to a recent "Inside EPA Weekly" report “Members of Congress, the Energy Department (DOE) and industry are debating ways of shielding participants in DOE's FutureGen power plant project from potential liabilities for storing the resulting carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions underground, as part of an effort to build a landmark near-zero emissions power facility”…”the discussion highlights one of the significant unresolved issues facing FutureGen and subsequent facilities that inject large quantities of CO2 into the ground as a way to minimize global warming”. We can imagine a scenario around this. Half-way through the operating life of a “FutureGen” plant, Terra wafts a robust leak, letting go years worth of “sequestered” CO2 in a short period. Stand back stratosphere, here it comes!

Some plausible outcomes of such a future occurance: there’s no chance of plugging the CO2 leak; the operating permit might require owners to shut down before the loan is paid off; there'll be talk of lawsuits; other similarly designed stations would be surrounded by protestors (the outrage, an exponential function of climate change impacts of the time); and, the newspaper headlines would ask “Now What Do We Do For Electricity?”

It seems impossible to reliably estimate the risk of an insecure CO2 sequestration project from a full-scale coal fired generator operating 24/7 for 50 years. If designers could calculate the risk with certainty, the design could be improved enough around the controlling variables to eliminate the need for liability insurance. But this is a new concept. One thing seems highly likely though. Taxpayers are going to foot the bill– either for the insurance, the operating loss, or (in the worst case) both.

Comments (1)

Look out stratosphere? Look out people and animals! Concentrated CO2 clouds can kill.

I have a partial fix for this problem. Instead of sizing these capture chambers for permanent capture, size them as CO2 reservoirs for anyone with a carbon fixation process.

Primarily I'm thinking of photosynthetic carbon fixation projects. Let the likes of GreenFuels, traditional hydroponics, and greenhouse agriculture tap the reservoir during daylight hours in their growing seasons.

jump to top Jason says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads