most popular:
100s of Dead Penguins



most popular: She Can Burn Her Water


most popular:
Affordable Electric Car


th comments
RemyC said: "That's sweet revenge, considering GM/Chevron conspired to pin Panasonic down to the ground by preventing them from continuing to make Nickel Metal ..." [read]

RemyC said: "hey bikesaddle, you really can't tell when someone's kidding, can you? have you seen alter eco? this week they launched an organic jean collection,..." [read]

Chat sohbet said: "Thank you guys Good post..." [read]

ARP said: "I would not ban them as I think it a bit overboard. I would charge for them or tax them. It's a win-win for most cities: they get more money and fe..." [read]

JoeP said: "When I read about the actions of Jimmy Carter, I am often struck by the accuracy and depth of his understanding of situations, but just as struck a..." [read]

Inhabitat Makes LEED Wax Poetic

by Lloyd Alter, Toronto on 06.30.06
Design & Architecture

inhabitat.jpg

When I can't get to sleep at night, I fire up a PDF of "LEED-NC Version 2.2. The rating system lists the intent, requirements, submittals, and technologies/strategies for each credit and includes the LEED-NC (U.S. Green Building Council’s (USGBC) Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Checklist. " Lets face it, LEED is boring. It is a prescriptive checklist of items that you put in your building and get points for. The more points, the better the rating. It is mind-numbing. It is design by spreadsheet, the victory of Excel over the pencil. Buildings that we would not have looked at twice get splashed everywhere, it is distorting our view of what is important about architecture and design.

That is why Inhabitat's new series on Green Building 101 is so remarkable and important.

In the first post, they take the truly boring title "Location and Linkages" which LEED might describe as "locations that are safe for inhabitants and the surrounding community, both human and ecological, and should not contribute to the degradation or loss of our agricultural and natural resource lands. Avoid building on sites that are environmentally sensitive or precious resources" and turn it into a clear, comprehensible and poetic manual for understanding why some sites are better than others.

For example, they turn "Minimize dependency on personal automobiles and associated environmental impacts by encouraging development patterns that allow for walking, biking, or transit as alternative means of transportation to necessary services. into "Live close to where you work, live close to where you shop, live close to where you party, and live close to the public transportation that can get you everywhere else cheaply, easily, and without firing up that SUV. This one choice is hugely beneficial for curbing global warming and decreasing air pollution. Its better for your health too."

It is also the Internet and the Blog at its best. In any other era someone would be doing this as a book, we would wait three years for it to come out, by which time LEED might have changed completely or become irrelevant. Here, the ink is barely dry on the new residential standard (hey, it is still in beta!) and we are seeing it analyzed and explained. Every week, those designing houses and looking for houses will get a bite-sized understanding of what all those points actually stand for. It is important work presented in serial form, not your usual ephemeral blog quickie.

We congratulate Niki, Kyle and Inhabitat on making LEED sing. We would never have thought it possible. ::Inhabitat

Comments (3)

Now hang on, Lloyd. Isn't the goal of Treehuggers like us to encourage the adoption of eco-friendly, sustainable practices in the mainstream? Having boring buildings LEED certified may be unaesthetic, but it shows the masses that going green does not have to mean straw bale walls and solar-heated water. Which is, as Martha would say, A Good Thing.

jump to top KPod [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

Yay, Inhabitat! I'm currently furiously studying so I can take the LEED v 2.1 test before they switch over the test to v2.2 which will be written in even more bureaucrat-ease.

However, just because a person has the LEED AP credential, doesn't mean that they are particularly well-versed in environmental building practices; they just studied for a test and passed it.I've worked with a lot of LEED AP's who still don't understand the basic principles of daylighting); appropriate site selection or eco-conscious material selection.

USGBC has good intentions, but basically it's becoming another proto-governmental instrument of big corporations. The reason I'm taking the test is so I have a better chance of working on sustainable building projects.

jump to top rayreiko says:

LEED is cool, LEED checklists are cool..a standard like LEED has to by nature describe abstractions that are by their nature "hollowed" of the imagistic language that we think of usually as poetic. LEED and its bureaucratic success are one of the most heartening developments in sustainability/environmentalism in a long time...so don't get bored with success so quickly..

It makes good copy to pit the romantic side of green against the technological but I feel that the writers who use the authorial Treehugger "we" should know better. Impressionable, creative people will start to think of LEED as not as cool as it is... Inhabitat, the object of your adoration in this post seems to find LEED important enough to structure its elegiac prose around the LEED-H standard...

jump to top Michael says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads