most popular:
2008 Holiday Gift Guides



most popular: Hot Home Wind Turbines


most popular:
$19k Electric Car in US


th comments
Jennifer said: "Very stylish! I definitely can see myself riding this to work...." [read]

Jay Fretz said: "If "The motors do not drive the car, but kick in to provide a power boost...", then how can "Range on electric alone is expected to to be in the or..." [read]

Jay said: "Sad story indeed. Unless we get the good fortune of offspring, Man will have yet again driven a species to extinction. Something it seem to be ve..." [read]

said: "OK, why isn't the option of voting to NOT tax gas guzzlers? There can be no shift to more fuel efficient vehicles unless more fuel efficient vehic..." [read]

Carl Trimble said: "I think its cell phone interference. If you talk to bees like I do, they hate cell phones. They want us to go back to land lines...." [read]

Plug-Ins to the Rescue: Minnesota May Nudge Ford Toward Greener Cars

by Jacob Gordon, Nashville, TN on 03.27.06
Business & Politics

Escape_Dials.jpg

A novel piece of legislation was proposed in Minnesota last week that would turn St. Paul’s ailing Ford Motor Plant into a leading producer of plug-in hybrids. The bill, being promoted by a bipartisan group of lawmakers, would create incentives for the auto plant to shift from making Ranger pickups, to making a line of plug-in hybrid Fords. It would also give $100,000 in funding to the Minnesota State University at Mankato to convert two flex-fuel vehicles to include plug-in technology. The authors of the bill hope that they can save the St. Paul plant from potential closure and help make the state a leader in making cutting-edge green vehicles. Plug-in hybrid conversion kits just recently came on the market, but no commercially produced plug-in cars are available yet. A biofuel plug-in would also be a first. :: Twincities.com

Comments (7)

Also they should put a solar panel on the roofs of plug in cars. Imagine cars sitting in parking lots for 8 hours a day while their owners are working, they'll be charging on there own.

jump to top donny murray says:

Donny, you just reminded me of this post about the solar Prius. True that most people just leave their cars parked in the sun for most of the day.

Wouldn't work in underground parkings, but maybe they could put solar panels or wind turbines on the roof of the building and people with plug in cars could plug them in outlets. Might be more efficient just to send that power directly to the grid, though.

jump to top MGR [TypeKey Profile Page] says:

Isn't a plug-in car just as eco-hurtful? Electricity is still generated by coal and plugging a car in just uses more coal (and creates more emissions). Kind of seems like robbing Peter to pay Paul to me....

jump to top Linda B says:

In response to Linda's comment, you are right that much of our power in the grid comes form non-renewable sources, but even as is, the conversion of energy for a plug-in is much better than a conventional ICE or hybrid car. Plug-ins also open the door to other energy sources more easily, whereas hybrids always run on petrol (unless they run on biofuel, which is a great option).

I plan to do Part II of the Anantomy of the Plug-in article that details the energy equation. Thanks for bringing that up--it's a hot debate with a lot of interesting angles.

jump to top Jacob Gordon says:

Bill McDonough should jump at this opportunity! So should Congressman Anthony Weiner (D-Queens & Brooklyn) and Councilman David Yassky (D-Brooklyn) who announced a plan to encourage Ford
Motor Company to make a hybrid version of its Crown Victoria taxi.

jump to top Anonymous says:

The short answer to Linda's important question is - no, plug-ins are not as eco-hurtful.
Even though the electricity is generated from coal and other fossil fuels, those processes are much more efficient than gasoline engines - so they can produce less CO2 per mile than gasoline engines. Further, as renewable resources for generating electricity come on line (wind, solar, nuclear) they can displace fossil fuel systems - and further reduce CO2 emissions. Finally, stationary power sources (like coal or natural gas plants)have the opportunity to store their CO2 (sequestration). That cannot be done if the fuel is consumed in an automobile. I'm not at all a fan of coal, but the more emphasis we place on developing renewable sources of electricity - the better this situation gets.

jump to top Ron Lloyd says:

Regarding the suggestion to put solar panels on electric vehicles (EVs) so they can charge while at work. Since an EV needs 5kW-hrs to 20kW-hrs of electric power to get home, those solar panels would weigh over 1/2 ton; so doesn't it make alot more sense to put them on the roof of the employer's building !!! How about some Government subsidies for the employers to do this? Until the system is maxed out by enough employees with EVs, the employers could reap the benefits of free electricity. Nice reward for going green!

jump to top Mark Haines says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

th ads
th top picks
th ads