th comments
TrollPatrol said: "This is simple water rights, this not a ground breaking change in law on the restriction of water harvesting. Different areas have different styles..." [read]

Brewse said: "Now is the time for action on the local stages across America. We have to help our young minds focus on responsible manufacturing on a local level,..." [read]

Brewse said: "40% of our fish supply in the states comes from fish farms with that number bound to increase in the coming years, I am looking for a good on line ..." [read]

TrollPatrol said: "@JSDryer, Because of their design they are likely going to spin slower than the the Vertical Axis sea mills -- and if I am understanding th..." [read]

jke said: "What's so eco-friendly about a toilet that uses water instead of toilet paper if waste water isnt really cleaned or robbed of its nutrients? For hy..." [read]

Recycling is cool but Inverse Manufacturing is Hot!

by Ruben Anderson– Vancouver, BC on 09. 6.05
TH Exclusives (random)

copier.gif Kudos to Canon and HP. A recent post highlighted the product stewardship programs that the two companies have launched for consumer products and printer cartridges, respectively. Fuji Xerox also deserves accolades for developing a product stewardship system. Ten years ago.

In fact, Fuji Xerox has the most TreeHugger program I have ever heard of. It begins, if you can imagine, with design...

Using ‘inverse manufacturing’, designers engineer components to maximize their potential. Then factories can dismantle old machines and, rather than melting them down to make new parts, just reassemble them in new machines.

Here’s how it works. If you have a little lever that is only used in one model of copy machine, it can be designed for a short life, made of cheap plastic, and recycled. But if you have a gear that is used in a copier, two different printers and a fax machine, then you design the part to not wear out, to have a long life. The principle is simple. Spend the big bucks, build it to last, and re-use it several times.

If Canon and HP want to get serious about reducing waste, they should take a look at Fuji Xerox’s inverse manufacturing system.

I first heard about it in a forwarded email from Britain’s Resource Recovery Forum. Highlights from a more recent article on Via3.net are:

-More than just toner cartridges, Fuji Xerox is making entire machines with 70% reused parts. This eliminates 75% of the CO2 emissions associated with manufacturing.

-Parts are designed to last for multiple generations and be usable in other models, not just the model they were built for. In 2003, 60% of reused parts were being put into their third generation of use.

-In 2003, Fuji Xerox had a surplus of US$570 000, which means “the income from reusing components exceeds expenditures for the purpose of product recycling.” This makes very clear that a national parts reclamation and re-use system can be profitable.

-To complement the lower-impact copy systems, Fuji Xerox has started producing paper, using newspaper pulp and FSC certified wood from the companies’ own plantations.

-After Japan, the company built a collection and recycling plant in Thailand, and has plans for China. Let’s hope they bring inverse manufacturing West.

Comments (2)

Hi, the Inverse manufacturing may be a recent word coined in the field of design but it is in use for the cosmetic industry for a long time now! Check out the stock perfume bottles, caps and collars for the example. I am also in the design of flacons and caps and collars thus we have strict rules to be followed for reuse or no reuse of the components. the parent company is ready to invest more in the tooling of the components if the same component is going to be used over and over, i.e. by making a more durable product. we also deal with modularity for the same factor.

jump to top Hitesh says:

Very cool. Reusing a finished product or part saves significant amounts of energy, as long as it isn't being shipped back and forth across the globe.

A related example is that of heavy machinery, such as Caterpillar earthmoving equipment. They are made to be extremely long-wearing, not only because the customer needs to be able to use it for 20-30 years to recover the investment, but because Cat also generates a nice second profit rebuilding their own equipment. The fewer parts they have to replace, the more profit they make on the rebuild. The success of that strategy is also determined during the design stage.

jump to top Carl says:
th ads
th top picks
th ads