most popular:
2008 Holiday Gift Guides



most popular: Hot Home Wind Turbines


most popular:
$19k Electric Car in US


th comments
sid said: "I don't like riding bikes with suspensions.. I prefer a hard tail even over rough conditions. I have never actually done serious off roading, but t..." [read]

JSDreyer said: "@ MKI, I was trying to be ridiculous. I forgot that you can actually use LCD opacity as a shader. I was trying to give the image of placin..." [read]

Aaron said: "For anyone who believes that normal snap traps are humane: I will leave you to judge what is and isn't humane, but you should be aware that these ..." [read]

good greif said: "These people are stupid. what they did didn't change anything. if they wanted to make change they should be raising money to help fund research i..." [read]

Jenny said: "Great article. I design eco-friendly clothing and have a store that sells it. I always tell my customers that the most important thing is how you..." [read]

Energetech’s wave energy

by TreeHugger on 04.29.05
Science & Technology (alternative energy)

Energetech-wave-nrg.jpgI thought maybe I’d fallen asleep in front of the TV and woken up to an ancient episode of Star Trek, but alas no. These guys at Energetech are serious about their ‘ultracapacitors’, ‘waveform zero crossings’, ‘transducers’ and ‘parabolic focusers’. And they aren’t even going into space — just down to the beach. They are installing a new form of wave energy off the coast south of Sydney and one off Rhode Island. They optimistically believe that wave energy will soon attain a 10% share of the renewable energy market. What makes their version different. Well, in their words “...

... the system employs a parabolic wall to focus wave energy on to an Oscillating Water Column (OWC) chamber. The rising and falling motion of the waves causes an oscillatory water motion within the chamber, which in turn forces a high-speed airflow past a unique controllable turbine.” The test plant in Australia could power 500 houses and will produce 2000 litres of desalinated water per day. A similar unit in RI does not affect the natural movement of seabed sediments, nor does it interfere with ‘bottom-dwelling’ critters, such as lobsters. Beam me down, Scotty. ::Energetech [by WM]

PS: see also Tim’s excellent post on four other wave energy units.

Thirsty for more? Check out these related articles:



    Comments (3)


    Hey, Rhode Island is a state! There's no such thing as Rhode Island, NY. (cool post otherwise!)

    jump to top Chilo says:

    Great idea to dissociate the actual turbine from the water, leaving sea creatures relatively undisturbed. The only drawback I can think of would be detritus building up inside the hydraulic part: that could be serious unless there is a self purge mechanism

    jump to top John Laumer says:

    Pardon my appalling geographic slip of the tongue. RI now returned to its own sovereign splendour!

    jump to top WM says:
    th ads
    th top picks
    th ads