most popular:
2008 Holiday Gift Guides



most popular: Hot Home Wind Turbines


most popular:
$19k Electric Car in US


th comments
JSDreyer said: "@ MKI, I was trying to be ridiculous. I forgot that you can actually use LCD opacity as a shader. I was trying to give the image of placin..." [read]

Aaron said: "For anyone who believes that normal snap traps are humane: I will leave you to judge what is and isn't humane, but you should be aware that these ..." [read]

good greif said: "These people are stupid. what they did didn't change anything. if they wanted to make change they should be raising money to help fund research i..." [read]

Jenny said: "Great article. I design eco-friendly clothing and have a store that sells it. I always tell my customers that the most important thing is how you..." [read]

Frants Combrink said: "I love these things too, but the one thing I constantly hear is the word "shipping." Jeeze, how about selling the plans so people can have the furn..." [read]

China: A Filthy Growth Engine

by TreeHugger on 04. 8.05
Business & Politics (news)

china.jpgThat's the cutline in the Business Week 11 April edition, not your garden variety enviro-mag. According to the article:
-70% of China's energy needs come from coal.
-regulation is non-existent or ignored.
-the consumer boom is stoking an appetite for cars and air conditioners , few of which meet even China's minimal efficiency rules.

But the most disturbing statistic: China spends three times the world average on energy, and seven times what Japan spends, to produce $1 of gross domestic product.

china2.jpgHere we depart from the article and weigh the implications of this. For every dollar of domestic production that we shut down in North America and export to China, three times as much fossil fuel is burned and three times as much greenhouse gases created. All this so that it can be exported back as a cheap product to be sold at Wal-Mart and Home Depot for less and keep our inflation down and our economy growing.

America should have signed the Kyoto accord. It would have been easy to meet the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets without doing much at all- just continue exporting the entire manufacturing base to China and the greenhouse gases go with it.

So, here is the Treehugger tip of the day: buy local. You may have to breathe a little more pollution from local manufacturing, but at least you can do something about it, and at least there will still be people here who know how to make things.


:: Business Week
will probably require an onerous but free online subscription.by [LA]

Comments (1)

I read the article from BusinessWeek, no fee required, but it is especially depressing. One of my collegues recently visited one of our company's manufacturing facilities in China, and he took a picture of the "stream" running by. It went from what one might call day-glow teal to black at the bottom.

I understand that in the US, commerce makes things happen, then the government follows (unlike our European counterparts), and I feel like buying and producing locally where the rules and environmental controls are a little more stringent (and incurring a little higher cost for a little higher quality) shouldn't be such foreign concepts.

One might reckon with our recent surge of patriotism, Made in the USA would be a point of pride.

jump to top Audrey says:
th ads
th top picks
th ads