Renewable Energy Can Reduce Poverty
by TreeHugger on 02. 2.05
Last week we had a piece on poverty and street people. Now the Netherlands Ministry of Spatial Planning, Housing and the Environment have released their latest online newsletter, Shared Spaces, addressing the links between energy availability and poverty. Jamal Saghir, Director of Energy and Water at the World Bank, writing in just one of many excellent articles, notes that “Access to electricity is synonymous with a better standard of living. Cost-effective and reliable energy helps alleviate poverty and enables economic development. No country in modern times has substantially reduced poverty without an increase in its use of energy.” Developed countries have an energy consumption ten times that of developing countries and the world’s richest billion people (simply meaning people who earn >$20,000USD p.a. -- so that probably includes most of us reading this!) use 25 times as much as the billion poorest. Renewable energy is one way to turn around this inequity ...
... and according to Mr Saghir even help improve a country’s balance of payments. He points out the obvious but often forgotten: “Electric lighting in schools and homes enables teaching, reading and socialising after dark. In hospitals and clinics it means service continues through the night. Modern energy services for cooking and lighting spare women and children the chore of collecting wood and fuel for fires. Children can use the time to attend school and women have more time for moneymaking or other family activities.” And aside from better living standards he also indicates that such energy services also improve “environmental health, particularly for the 2.4 billion people in developing countries who rely on traditional biomass (wood, dung etc.) for cooking and heating.” For many other stories on this topic skip over to ::Shared Spaces [by WM]
Thirsty for more? Check out these related articles:
- Green Spaces NY - where eco entrepreneurs get down to business.
- US Chamber Of Commerce On The Inside Energy Policy Track
- Bush Administration Takes Another Last Minute Poke at the Environment: Approves Easier Coal Mine Waste Dumping in Streams
- Barack Obama Faces Environmental Clean Up After Two Centuries of Bingeing: Bill McKibben
I agree with the sentiment of this post, but a key phrase in the report was "Cost-effective and reliable energy." Right now most forms of renewable energy are significantly more expensive than traditional, more polluting energy. Until we can bring the cost of renewable energy down, I can understand why developing nations would opt for coal plants, etc., lamentable as that may be.
Anderkoo, when you say "Right now" you may be correct. But largely because in most cases govt support and subsidies are locked into the old industries. Surely, coal should be able to stand on its own two feet by this time. And in areas where there no reliable existing electricity then solar, wind, micro-hydro and biomass are likely to be cheaper than establishing some centralised coal-fired plant. This story http://www.infochangeindia.org/changemakers19.jsp (first spotted @ WorldChanging.com) is one such renewable energy example, and extending well beyond the $/kWh formula to include social benefits.
Silly me, and all along I thought the whole point of renewable energy was to make the oil, coal and nuke men poor! :)