th comments
Katie said: "They're pretty, but I wouldn't want to be wearing one of those on a hot summer day. Sweaty helmet hair is not very attractive...." [read]

MRE64 said: "i agree there are a lot of people who know nothing about computers (should these people use them at all?) for the rest of us, just change t..." [read]

sachxn said: "will buy one for my daughter...." [read]

Joe Wilson said: "I have to agree with the first comment, rubbermaid containers are food safe, and alot stronger then a glass fish tank, which has to be covered with..." [read]

racetoinfinity said: "I want to simply say, that at this late date, I can't believe the deniers of human caused climate change. Willful ignorance!..." [read]

Australia's New Solar Tower Could Generate 200 Megawatts

by on 02.28.05
Science & Technology (solar)

solar2_t.gifMelbourne-based EnviroMission Limited recently invested in a 25,000-acre sheep farm in the Australian outback in order to make a power plant. But the alternative energy project isn't driven by manure. Instead it’ll use a kilometer-high thermal power station called the Solar Tower. Though the project was announced several years ago, the details are just being ironed out--construction of the 3,280-foot tower won't begin until 2006 at the earliest.

The Solar Tower, according to wired, “is one of the most ambitious alternative energy projects on the planet: a renewable energy plant that pumps out the same power as a small reactor but is totally safe.”

Hollow in the middle, the tower has a base with a solar collector, a 25,000-acre “skirt.” As air under the collector is heated by the sun, it’s funneled up the chimney by convection, as it accelerates to 35 m.p.h., it begins driving 32 wind turbines that in turn generate electricity much like wind farms do. But unlike traditional wind farms and solar generators, the Solar Tower can operate round the clock, even when there’s no wind, because it has banks of solar cells which can store heat energy.

Though the tower could generate up to 200 megawatts--enough electricity to power 200,000 homes and will keep 830,000 tons of greenhouse gases out of the atmosphere annually—it comes at high cost; with production costs somewhere between $500 million to $750 million these things don’t come cheap. ::Wired News [by MO]

Comments (4)

Quite a cool project, with basically not "externalized" costs to society once they are built. I hope that they'll make many more all around the globe. 200MW is a very decent amount for one solar installation.

200MW * 24 * 365 = 1.752 Billion KWh/year

As far as I know 1 KWh costs about 20c or so over here, 1.752 billion * 20c = roughly $350 million a year. Even if it costs $750 million (assuming that's Australian dollars), the tower will pay for itself after around 2 years, if no premium is charged for clean energy.

jump to top Leon says:

Hey Leon,

Your maths is correct but you forgot to factor in the distribution costs, cabling charges, maintenance levies and of course the government taxes.
I think with those added in the payback would stretch out to 20 or 30 years.
Cheers

jump to top grello jam says:

Aha, you're right. Didn't think of that stuff.

jump to top Leon says:
th ads
th top picks
th ads