most popular:
66 Gas Saving Tips



most popular:
7 Best Electric Scooters


th comments
Elepski said: "I have to say.. this is really pathetic This is a classic case of the "sue everyone for everything America" Sometime accidents just..." [read]

said: "Aw c'mon Maria, have a sense of humor. The author is awoman, and speaking as a DD myself, I find the concept hilarious! ..." [read]

Alejandro Mosquera said: "Great article, really informative, and also helpful links, thanks..." [read]

Brian said: "This is a common problem in rural areas where dogs run free more often than not. While most rural dog owners accept this fact it is clear these tw..." [read]

brian said: "Interesting idea; if only there wasn't sweatshop labor involved, I would take it more seriously...." [read]

Fuel Cells get their act together

by on 01. 9.05
Business & Politics (news)

fuel-cell_stack.jpgWell, they sure aren’t the most sexy things to look at, so why all the excitment? Because they are being touted as the replacement for the fossil-fuel-guzzling, greenhouse-gas-emitting combustion engine. So a lot is resting on their shoulders. At its most basic; hydrogen is feed in one side, oxygen the other side. the hydrogen splits in two - the protons slip through a dividing membrane. But remaining electrons are forced to go around and in doing so, are captured as electricity, before recombining with the oxygen to form little old H2O. Yep, it emits just plain old water. Of course, thats the chemistry, possible in a lab. But getting it to happen in generally available products, like automobiles, is a magic trick, that some of our best scientific minds are currently trying to solve. However, late last week, the U.S. Dept. of Energy (DOE) advised that a “major milestone” had been achieved.

They said that “Delphi Corp. has reached a power density level in its fuel-cell program that will greatly reduce the cost of the technology and make fuel cells competitive in the commercial market.” Apparently this will allow the fuel cell development to “meet the government's energy-production target of $400 per kilowatt hour -- about one tenth of the cost of energy produced by current fuel cell models.” There are several methods of getting a fuel cell to function, but most research is going into Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) technology - the one described above. It’s expected that 30 companies, worldwide, will have commerical products out this year, so regardless of looks, it could indeed be an exciting year for fuel cells. Learn more on fuel cell powered vehicles, at fueleconomy.gov a website by both the DOE and EPA. Via ::Sustainable Business and ::Fuel Cell Today [by WM]

Comments (1)

Why does everybody go getting all "raw-raw" everytime a new hydrogen/fuel cell announcement is made? There's still a myriad of hurdles to overcome before hydrogen energy becomes terribly feasible, the first of which being that at present, the generation of hydrogen is more of an energy exchange than anything else - most often using natural gas. Last time I checked, natural gas isn't too renewable... Furthermore, the proton exchange membrane (PEM) in fuel cells is essentially a chunk of Saran Wrap (TM) wedged between the anode and cathode. I have real trouble believing that such a critical piece of the puzzle is going to stand up to the rigors of being jammed in a vehicle and bounced around the highways of North America for tens of thousands of kilometres. Frankly, I think the focus needs to shift more towards hybrids, biofuel (biodiesel hybrids would get me hott as hell...) and looking at ways to get as many SUV's off the roads as possible.
Of course, this is more of a "fuel cell in a vehicle" type rant - I'm sure in a stationary environment there would be far more feasible uses for 'em.

jump to top garthbreaks [TypeKey Profile Page] says:
th ads
th top picks
th ads