Stapless Stapler

by TreeHugger on 12.31.04
Design & Architecture (workspace)

staplers.jpgIf a stapler doesn’t use staples, then shouldn’t it be called a stapless? Or maybe an unstaple? We’ll leave that one to the linguists, but for the time being, we’ll refer to it as the manufacturers do, as a “staple-less stapler.” Instead of using the tiny pieces of metal that add up to lots of waste, this ingenious little device joins your papers by punching a small, neat hole in your documents and folding the remaining flaps together for a secure binding. No paper is torn off of your sheets and there’s nothing to toss out or pry apart with your fingernails. So simple, but so smart. We’re sure even Milton would give up his red Swingline for this. $5.95 ::ShiptheWeb.com [by MO]

Follow @TreeHugger on Twitter & get our headlines with @TH_rss!

Comments (30)

How can this possibly hold two (let alone several) pieces of paper together?

jump to top Joe says:

I'll pay 6 bucks for one just to see how they work, and if it works just as well as an old-fashioned stapler, I'll probably keep using it. The best part is that you don't need replacement staples all of the time.

jump to top Randy says:

Just fyi these types of staplers are very common in Japan. They prefer it to having metal in the paper. The one downside is that your average cheap american stapler can easily do 10 sheets of paper at once. These cheap one's can't and may be limited to 3 or 4 sheets max. I've been meaning to pick one up for a while now.

jump to top Mike says:

i have a different looking staple-free stapler that i picked up at a museum shop. i think CB2 carries the same type. it staples by punching out a strip and makes a little slit underneath, then weaves the strip into the slit... if that makes any sense.

jump to top karen says:

Just FYI, you can get a somewhat bigger stapler of this type from J-List.com (the larger one can staple up to 7 sheets):

http://www.jbox.com/SEARCH/Sun-Star%20Paper%20StitchLock/1/

jump to top alkahest says:

I was happy with a similar staple-less stapler for the first ten minutes. Then I tried to staple a few extra pages, you know, just to see, and *pop* something broke and it stopped working altogether.

While the box did say that it would only bind four sheets at a time, it didn't say that it would *kill it* to try more...

The one bind it made was really nice looking, though; it was neat the way it tucked the flap through the slot it cut. One staple saved?

jump to top Jacob says:

For what it's worth, a device without staples would be, for what I can figure out, described as staple-less, pure and simple, for two reasons:

1) Suffixes in English usually don't contract with their root words. For example, see:
http://onelook.com/?w=*leless&ls=a

2) If we had "stapless", the pronounciation would become STAHP-less (compare with STAY-pull). The "STAHP" sound would obscures where the word "stapless" originates from since "staple" has the STAY sound we've come to know and love. Hence, staple-less would keep the original punctuation and cause less confusion.

End pedantry.

jump to top hao2lian says:

Here's my stapleless gizmo, from the excellent (but kinda pricey) GarrettWade tool catalogue...

http://tinyurl.com/7xbl9

It kind of has a vaguely old school design, which I'm ok with that this time around. Plus, it works like a charm.

I have an antique (or at least somewhat old) metal version of this device which was made in Japan, and it works fine up to 3 or 4 sheets of paper. I haven't thrown away the regular stapler, though, as I still need it for larger stacks of paper. Also, an advantage to a regular stapler is that you can remove and re-staple when necessary. Still, reducing material use is a goal of sustainability, and widespread regular use would mean less staples in landfills.

I wonder if the materials used to produce this "non-stapler" meet cradle to cradle design criteria? These devices will wear out. What happens when they do? Can they be disassembled and remade into new products, or are they destined for the landfill?

jump to top scott reuter says:

Yeah, make sure to NOT post pictures of what the actual "staple" looks like, since noone has ever seen one, why would you post something like that?

jump to top Bob says:

What's the big deal? We had one back in the 1960s. It cut an elongated tab into the paper, with two slits below it perpendicular to the tab, and threaded the tab through the slits.

Pretty neat, but it couldn't handle more than five or six sheets. And unlike a staple, which can be removed leaving only two tiny holds, this pretty much mutilates the pages beyond any hope of restoring them to their original state.

These have been around for at least 40 years. There's a good reason they never caught on big.

jump to top Matt says:

I'd call it a staplelesser just because it is cute and lessens the use of staples. :)

jump to top Jordan says:

Hey guys.
I think the best part of staple-less stapling is that i could put the result straight through the shredder (and then the compost) when it's use by date came up. I really hate the fiddly chore of pulling staples out.

jump to top grello jam says:

Here's some video showing the device in action.

http://www.virtualstapler.com/gallery/paperstapler.asp

jump to top Vienne says:

It's simple enough to consumerize a core press that punches a pair of third-pi rotated 3/4 circle slits, pokes that stack down as the knife comes out, then punches a pair of back-textured slits that push more paper over the depressed bit. That would hold a moderately thick paper stack. Even better, you can thread in undesired hair and scare it outta ever growing back, plus stitch-bind in one step. Or you can show your true confidence in your tattoo professional of choice by getting 12 Prince Alberts in one 20 minute session with that tool.

Now, to staple 30+ sheets, you want to waffle the edge a bit to get stability, so a pneumatic press is called for. Or a staple. You -did- print 30 sheets, after all.

That, and an actual proofer for inkjet printer settings to fake preprint things and show how things (envelope printing) would be damaged, would be neat. Even just to say 'no, that version of Mellel is -never- going to print that tyvek thing.'

jump to top Steve Nordqolandia says:

You can find it in France at 5 € at the following URl:

http://www.toutallantvert.com/agrafeuse-sans-agrafes-p-153.html

jump to top Georges says:

These little gadgets are amazing--i'm a a recruiter, I recycle a LOT of resumes--they work like a charm, and I don't waste staples! Papers stick together very well.

jump to top Rebecca says:

My mother picked up one of these at a garage sale.

At first I thought it was one of those silly arts-n-crafts things that cuts frilly patterns into paper.

When I discovered what it actually was, I was amazed at its ingenuity.

I didn't have a use for it at the time, but now that I have to staple 2 sheets of paper together all day, I'd rather have one of these.

jump to top Jeremy says:

Actually this type of device has been around for over 95 years.The stapleless stapler was first patented in the United States in 1910. Two separate companies developed devices that bound paper by a cutting and weaving method. The Clipless Stand Machine and Bump's New Model Paper Fastener, for some reason they never became as popular as the fasteners that used staples. Now, stapleless staplers are are manufactured by scores of office supply companies.
Here is my favorite:
http://www.gyroscope.com/d.asp?product=STAPLER

Unlike staplers that use staples, these machines don't jam or break as often, if used as directed. Papers fastened with a stapleless stapler can be easily pulled apart, only leaving a tiny, curved incision that's barely noticeable. For those Tree-huggers concerned about excess waste, these gadgets don't squander resources of metal and they make paper easier to recycle or pass through a paper shredder.

jump to top Jeffrey Slocum says:

Ehhh, I'm kinda late to post a comment on the stapless stapler thing, but a... here ya go. There's a video showing how one of those thingies work.

http://www.virtualstapler.com

jump to top Ray says:

These are also useful in settings where there are limits on sharps, such as a residential treatment center.

jump to top Ruth says:

There is a cheaper model now available,
http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.680~r.30909880

jump to top Alan says:

Really cute :)

jump to top Ivan Minic says:

i think this thingy is hecka awesome!
~i am the bomb~

jump to top nicole says:

I ordered a free sample of this stapler and am currently in the process of sending my free sample back to the company! I thought I could use it to save resources (staples.) But the thing came packaged in so much plastic that I'd have to go through an awful lot of staples to make up for the packaging. Layer upon layer of plastic bubble wrap.

And the thing doesn't even work! The pages pull apart very easily. Ridiculous!

jump to top Beth Terry says:

The idea is a great one, but I too wonder how well paper on paper holds up. I'll have to go look for a physical sample

jump to top TT says:

this is frakin sweet

jump to top jordynn says:

I cant believe this! I bought it and it works. Stapless stapler one for the record books kids. We can save the earth one small change at a time! I love this stuff!!!!!

jump to top emma feary says:

This is the one that I have been using and it works like a charm.

jump to top Molder says:

I bought a similar product a few years ago as an impulse buy, I think at The Container Store. It's such an ingenious idea! I was inspired to invent a spin-off to this idea: the tabless tab.

jump to top Naomi says:

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)




th top picks