State Department releases Keystone XL environment assessment
In an apparent Friday news dump, the State Department has released an environmental assessment of the Keystone XL pipeline. The Washington Post summarizes the 2,000 page report:
Canada’s oil sands will be developed even if President Obama denies a permit to the pipeline connecting the region to Gulf Coast refineries, the analysis said. Such a move would also not alter U.S. oil consumption, the report added.
...
But the detailed environmental report — which runs close to 2,000 pages long — also questions one of the strongest arguments for the pipeline, by suggesting America can meet its energy needs over the next decade without it. The growth in rail transport of oil from western Canada and the Bakken Formation on the Great Plains and other pipelines, the analysis says, could meet the country’s energy needs for the next decade, even if Keystone XL never gets built.
The report made waves across Twitter, as Keystone XL activists, climate hawks and green journalists reacted to the news. A sampling:
Releasing a crappy KXL review on Friday during the sequester is exactly the "business as usual" Obama promised to end.
— Jamie Henn (@Agent350) March 1, 2013
Why the State Dept analysis of KXL is so flawed and cynical: bit.ly/14b7ZcR #nokxl #climate @climateforward @sierraclub @350
— Michael Brune (@bruneski) March 2, 2013
State Dept: #KeyStoneXL "little impact on climate change" (washingtonpost.com/national/healt…) Hmm. The line sounds so familiar..sfgate.com/news/science/a…
— Michael E. Mann (@MichaelEMann) March 1, 2013
Truly beyond irony: State Dept spends pages making sure pipeline won't be hurt by rapid climate change keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov/documents/orga…
— Bill McKibben (@billmckibben) March 2, 2013
The whole "tar sands will be developed either way" argument is belied by numerous statements from analysts & the industry itself.
— David Roberts (@drgrist) March 1, 2013
NOTE: You can find some of those statements from analysts David references here, here and here.
@drgrist it also ignores a principled alternative: "tar sands may be developed either way, but we choose not to be complicit"
— oceans initiative (@oceansresearch) March 1, 2013
State dept also says we CAN meet our energy needs w/o Keystone, which takes away one key TransCanada argument. washingtonpost.com/national/healt…
— Kate Gordon (@katenrg) March 1, 2013
State: If #KXL not built, life-cycle carbon emissions associated w/ oilsands estimated to decrease 70K to 830K metric tons of CO2e a year
— Bryan Walsh (@bryanrwalsh) March 1, 2013
w/o #KXL oil sands production falls just 0.4-0.6%; if all proposed pipelines blocked, oil sands production down 2-4%, according to State
— nickjuliano (@nickjuliano) March 1, 2013
The @pwrhungry piece on how railroads might pick up oil sands slack w/o #KXL useful read now: slate.com/articles/healt…
— Bryan Walsh (@bryanrwalsh) March 1, 2013
By one estimate, oil by rail in Canada has now reached 300,000 barrels per day, more than half of Keystone capacity: bit.ly/13uK1xw
— brad plumer (@bradplumer) March 1, 2013
2 weeks ago, @eschor argued environmentalists were erring in focusing too much on emissions as result of Keystone XL: theatlantic.com/politics/archi…
— David A. Graham (@GrahamDavidA) March 1, 2013
There hasn’t been a single study on what a worse-case scenario spill from KXL would do to land and water in Nebraska.
— Jamie Henn (@Agent350) March 1, 2013
To see just how sandy it can get in the "non-Sandhills" area of NE crossed by #KXL, check out the pic w/this story: bit.ly/S57GvS
— Elana Schor (@eschor) March 1, 2013
New Obama Admin. Report on Keystone XL Pipeline Has Enviros Worried bit.ly/14aTTYT
— Mother Jones (@MotherJones) March 1, 2013
Obama still has the final decision on Keystone. Rejection looking increasingly unlikely, but no sense letting up on the pressure.
— David Roberts (@drgrist) March 1, 2013
Quick response: email keystonecomments@state.gov to say #NOKXL to @statedept's draft #EIS @350 @tarsandsaction @kxlblockade
— Tara Escudero (@TaraEscudero) March 1, 2013
Self-imposed harm to present: sequester. Self-imposed harm to future: Keystone XL. Great Friday, America!
— David Roberts (@drgrist) March 1, 2013
Truly beyond irony: State Dept spends pages making sure pipeline won't be hurt by rapid climate change keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov/documents/orga…
— Bill McKibben (@billmckibben) March 2, 2013
I AM OFFICIALLY DECLARING THIS DAY OVER. No further bad news will be permitted.
— David Roberts (@drgrist) March 1, 2013














