Sarah Palin Defends "Drill, Baby, Drill" on Twitter


Image: Twitter, @SarahPalinUSA
Palin's Twisted Logic
You have to give her that, it takes guts to seriously pretend that the BP oil spill tragedy in the Gulf of Mexico is evidence that "drill, baby, drill" was a more environmentally-friendly policy. Let's start with the hypocrisy: Never at any time before the BP oil spill did the "drill, baby, drill" crowd advocate stopping offshore drilling and replacing it with onshore drilling. They wanted more offshore drilling and more onshore drilling, making the likelihood of oil spills higher, not lower.
Image: Twitter, @SarahPalinUSA
False Choice
There is also a false choice implied here. As if the only choices available to us were to drill offshore or onshore (or both, which is what Palin really wants). Even if drilling was allowed in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR), it would take years for that oil to start to flow, and it wouldn't make that big a difference on the supply side of things.

Another (better) option is to spend that time working on demand; by making our vehicles and industry more efficient, we can save the equivalent of all the oil contained in the Wildlife Refuge and more. Not only would that avoid damage to pristine wilderness, keep a lot of carbon in the ground, and avoid the risk of an oil spill like the Deepwater Horizon disaster, but it would also help make the U.S. more competitive on the world stage. Energy efficient vehicles and industrial processes are growth sectors for the long-term, not fossil fuels. And any innovation that makes us more energy-efficient keeps benefiting us forever, while oil will run out eventually...

Via Twitter

More on BP Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico
BP Denies Existence of Giant Underwater Oil Plumes
Will a Rough Hurricane Season Worsen the BP Oil Spill?
NASA Captures First Photos of Massive 'Arm' of Oil Slick (Hundreds of Miles Long)
"BP Cares" T-shirt (With Oil Stains)

Tags: Oil Spill